Upgrade your computer hardware and software people. Its costing your business money.
Showing posts with label cost benefit analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cost benefit analysis. Show all posts
Monday, August 6, 2012
Monday, July 16, 2012
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Infographic Thursday - The App Bubble
Recently I was contemplating building an empire via making apps.
Turns out that while there are a few success stories - there a plenty of failures.
Turns out that while there are a few success stories - there a plenty of failures.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Small beginnings and big bytes - an Apple story
Ok so it was my sons 1st birthday recently, and he got one of these from his grandma
But you see while I don't profess to be a big Apple fan. Fact of the matter is they are a big part of my life of who I am and how I have got to where I am.
I most likely would not have leaped into IT/IS or even business computing - except for the fact that when I was 5 - my father got me this.
This good ol' Apple II lasted me all the way though my Schooling years. It did nothing really practical, it had no printer, no word processor. It had a joystick, increase ram and a 4 colour display - so it was mainly used for games.
But it taught me some very basic things. How to type fast, how to think fast and most importantly how to be patient when it comes to loading. At the time if you wanted a personal computer and had money you got a Apple II, if you were cheap or had some fancy ERP tool you got IBM's 8086. It was a strange market. But basically the II changed the way people thought about computing. It created personal computing.
Then when at Middle school I got to use this:
The Mac classic. The perfect device with the worst execution. It had a lot going for it except good marketing. It was an all in one unit. It was light enough to carry. It HAD resolution. It was the first FANLESS computers - something unheard of in the electronics industry.
This computer should have captured the whole market. But it failed horribly and was eaten alive in the red market that had become the personal computer. Acer, IBM, Compaq, Tandy, HP, Atari............it was no longer a 2 horse game. And some of the competitors were cut throat pirates.
Apple was being cut and started to bleed. From recall this was when Jobs started to get young and reckless - the other owners of apple noticed and cut him from the fray. Thankfully they still had a fan base.
Come to College I found myself using one of these...
The LC was not a bad machine, it just wasn't a good one. It was doing what everyone else was doing hardware wise, software wise it was completely propriety. This was the 90's and now Microsoft ruled the roost - not by selling computers, but by selling the operating system. The market had changed and people paid pennies less for the hardware, but more for all the software. The giants of the valley were now companies like Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia........ as they had the I.P. and most of the hardware was now being made out of China.
Jobs was rehired, and refocused. A massive cash injection came into Apple via Microsoft. And I then had to deal with this before I went to University.
The imac was everything the Mac Classic should have been, it was an all in one unit that had the marketing weight of a heavy weight boxer on crack. It forced the competition to rethink its game. To think about things like case design and ergonomics. To think about colours (beige cases and monitors were all the rage - not!).
However at this point the computers only had a cult following. They were expensive and next to useless to most people.
It was never that I disliked Apple...........I always appreciated them from an engineers perspective. It was that I could see their failures from a business perspective. But I was fortunate to own the computer that made Apple a great computer company. A world leader. Now my son can experience that with their iPAD.
Now you can understand why Apple's model had to change - there market was never computers. That was simply the first market they tried. They needed to think past that and find out what people were not doing. In the 1970's people were not making personal computers. In the 1990's people were not making MP3 players with lots of storage. In the 2000's people were not making useable, reliable tablets.
Turns out the Woz (the others guy who started Apple with Jobs in the 70's) knew this all along. Check out his Q&A below.
http://farrstdevelopments.blogspot.com/2012/06/listen-to-what-woz-has-to-say.html
But you see while I don't profess to be a big Apple fan. Fact of the matter is they are a big part of my life of who I am and how I have got to where I am.
I most likely would not have leaped into IT/IS or even business computing - except for the fact that when I was 5 - my father got me this.
This good ol' Apple II lasted me all the way though my Schooling years. It did nothing really practical, it had no printer, no word processor. It had a joystick, increase ram and a 4 colour display - so it was mainly used for games.
But it taught me some very basic things. How to type fast, how to think fast and most importantly how to be patient when it comes to loading. At the time if you wanted a personal computer and had money you got a Apple II, if you were cheap or had some fancy ERP tool you got IBM's 8086. It was a strange market. But basically the II changed the way people thought about computing. It created personal computing.
Then when at Middle school I got to use this:
The Mac classic. The perfect device with the worst execution. It had a lot going for it except good marketing. It was an all in one unit. It was light enough to carry. It HAD resolution. It was the first FANLESS computers - something unheard of in the electronics industry.
This computer should have captured the whole market. But it failed horribly and was eaten alive in the red market that had become the personal computer. Acer, IBM, Compaq, Tandy, HP, Atari............it was no longer a 2 horse game. And some of the competitors were cut throat pirates.
Apple was being cut and started to bleed. From recall this was when Jobs started to get young and reckless - the other owners of apple noticed and cut him from the fray. Thankfully they still had a fan base.
Come to College I found myself using one of these...
Jobs was rehired, and refocused. A massive cash injection came into Apple via Microsoft. And I then had to deal with this before I went to University.
The imac was everything the Mac Classic should have been, it was an all in one unit that had the marketing weight of a heavy weight boxer on crack. It forced the competition to rethink its game. To think about things like case design and ergonomics. To think about colours (beige cases and monitors were all the rage - not!).
However at this point the computers only had a cult following. They were expensive and next to useless to most people.
It was never that I disliked Apple...........I always appreciated them from an engineers perspective. It was that I could see their failures from a business perspective. But I was fortunate to own the computer that made Apple a great computer company. A world leader. Now my son can experience that with their iPAD.
Now you can understand why Apple's model had to change - there market was never computers. That was simply the first market they tried. They needed to think past that and find out what people were not doing. In the 1970's people were not making personal computers. In the 1990's people were not making MP3 players with lots of storage. In the 2000's people were not making useable, reliable tablets.
Turns out the Woz (the others guy who started Apple with Jobs in the 70's) knew this all along. Check out his Q&A below.
http://farrstdevelopments.blogspot.com/2012/06/listen-to-what-woz-has-to-say.html
Labels:
Apple,
bullpad,
communications,
confidence,
cost benefit analysis,
decision making,
delusions,
economics,
education,
indirect competition,
internet,
introverts,
marketing,
poor business practices
Monday, April 9, 2012
Rubbish Suppliers and blast-from-the-past emails
Digging through some old emails, I found a fantastic one about a poorly performing supplier.
Names have been changed to protect all involved........have a read. Then you decide if you would deal with this supplier?
But I will simply explain the events that transpired yesterday.
During his presentation, it became obvious that at-least 60% was to stroke his own ego. However when put on the spot about his own business issues, he did not have the substance to back it up.
(I can elaborate on this more if you require).
If his ego could not be stroked during the presentation, he would then move to downgrade the people in the room or the products you sell.
As * said best to me afterward "He always attempts to be right even when he is wrong". There were threats that "* are currently in a partner agreement", with emphasis on current.
However I would like to congratulate everyone else in the room on the same not. They were polite, and keep their feelings to themselves, I know a lot of the people in the industry would have told * to f-off if they had been put in this position.
Names have been changed to protect all involved........have a read. Then you decide if you would deal with this supplier?
"Hope you holiday is
going well. I thought it was best I gave you an update about the events of yesterday.
As you know Myself,* had a meeting with *, as a basic
training session for the * product in NZ.
Meeting *
reminding myself of why I left Australia.
Talking to the other staff who have dealt with him, needless to say his attitudes are in the wrong place.
Talking to the other staff who have dealt with him, needless to say his attitudes are in the wrong place.
But I will simply explain the events that transpired yesterday.
With everyone in the
room, it was noticeable that * was not at ease with the people there. It
became faily obvious that he was demanding a very high level of support
(something that was starting to tire *)
He suggested that we
introduce ourselves, to which * was first to volunteer. When * said he
was the Automation sales rep, * immediately questioned why he did not have * in he portfolio. Stating - "I will have to have a talk to * later
about this" He then continued to dominate the conversation not allowing * to
finish speaking about what he hoped to achieve out of the training session. This
was not only stupid (as we were all attending a "* Basics" training
session) but also completely arrogant to assume that pushing his complaints to * would some how fix the situation. Eventually I spoke up stating that
"As of this point * is not a part of his
portfolio, so you can not blame him", to which his reply was "clearly something
is wrong if * is not there."
At this point *
looked liked he wanted to throw something at *, however he bit his lip and
remained quiet. The introductions continued around the table, ending with *
introducing himself.
During his presentation, it became obvious that at-least 60% was to stroke his own ego. However when put on the spot about his own business issues, he did not have the substance to back it up.
(I can elaborate on this more if you require).
If his ego could not be stroked during the presentation, he would then move to downgrade the people in the room or the products you sell.
As * said best to me afterward "He always attempts to be right even when he is wrong". There were threats that "* are currently in a partner agreement", with emphasis on current.
Other bold claims
were also made, one in particular was "That's bullshit, I came over 18 months ago
and trained people here (*)" to which I questioned "Who was
trained?" to which I got no reply.
* was supposed to
have known a Japanese protocol. Because according to Steve he should know
because he was Asian. (He is Chinese).
He failed to accept
our claims that we have to support more than one agency, and would attempt to
subvert out existing agencies, often asking "Does anything else you have do
this?".
By lunchtime both * looked like they could not be bothered continuing the meeting
after lunch, and said thank you and attended emails.
I grabbed * and
went to lunch - explaining to him that this is how some people are, and he was
free to speak his mind. Needless to say he was not in a good mood and needed to
vent.
* took over in
the afternoon - which eased things somewhat. This also meant * did not need
to attend - which was a good thing as it looked like * had painted a big
target on his back.
I found that *'s
attitude was not only negative, but wrong. Lord knows how he wants us to promote
sales of this product after that episode.
Very rarely have I had such rubbish in front of a supplier, and
never have I had it FROM a supplier.
Very rarely have I had such rubbish in front of a supplier, and
never have I had it FROM a supplier.
However I would like to congratulate everyone else in the room on the same not. They were polite, and keep their feelings to themselves, I know a lot of the people in the industry would have told * to f-off if they had been put in this position.
I just feel you
should be aware about what happened, as I imagine there will be an email from * complaining about how we are not good enough."
Infographic Tuesday - LinkedIn Networking
I got a few emails regarding my Facebook InfoTuesday post. So thought I better continue the trend with another networking site.
Turns out people get projects through linkedin also! So perhaps that could be another tool for your sales guys to get into doors previously left closed?
Turns out people get projects through linkedin also! So perhaps that could be another tool for your sales guys to get into doors previously left closed?
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Infographic Tuesday : Facebook
As of yet Blind Management doesn't yet have a Facebook page (its on the 'todo list'.......in the meantime check out the Farrst Development one). But here is a great little infographic about stuff you didn't know about Facebook.
-Stew
-Stew
Friday, March 16, 2012
Nokia Tablet
With a rumor of a Nokia Tablet coming out. Thought I better post something I worked on a few years ago.....The Nokia based "BullPad"
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Thursday, February 23, 2012
End of the world. Doomsday Economics
People have often thought my stance on "1 child policies are the only way we will be saved" as crazy man talk. But for me its simple math. We need to maintain or decrease the world consumption. The easiest way to decrease consumption is to decrease the population.
Here is a very good video as to why I might not be the crazy after all. Think of the maths. They are quite simple.
Here is a very good video as to why I might not be the crazy after all. Think of the maths. They are quite simple.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
What was supposed to be "Infographic Tuesday" (sorry I was sick)
Today's one is about Student debt - and how we are creating a false hope for many students.
It is placed in comparison to many 'bubble market' crisis's.
Education News
Education News


Monday, January 23, 2012
Infographic Tuesday
Here a picture really does speak a million words. I figure someone else can say what I am thinking right now than I can.
So here you go - the first (hopefully not the last); Info-graphic Tuesday
So here you go - the first (hopefully not the last); Info-graphic Tuesday
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)