Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Product Management/Product Marketing - The Nissan GTR35
I am going to post this as a part of "Supercar Sunday" for Farrst Developments - but there is so much good business material in this short movie I couldn't help but also put it here to for you all to see. Seems that Carlos Ghosn is a very smart man, and a very savvy business leader.
I have no doubt in my mind that he was very instrumental in getting the R35 out of drawing boards and into real life. I can understand why the Japanese people look up to him, and why Renault grabbed him when they did.
Topics covered:
- Product Management,
- Product Marketing, - Marketing Management,
- Task Management,
- Competitive Markets
.....Enjoy
Labels:
decision making,
indirect competition,
industry,
management,
marketing,
markets,
nissan,
organizational behavior,
personality,
product,
sales,
sales pitch,
strategic cooperative agreement,
suppliers,
technology
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Monday, August 13, 2012
Marketing in the Cellphone Industry - Stewart Farr (2001)
("I know this is a bit old now guys.........but makes for some interesting reading when you reflect on it - turns out I was right, and Apple cashed in on this concept" -Stew)
1.1 The purpose of marketing in the Cellphone industry.
The purpose of marketing cellphone's, is no longer to sell a simple
piece of electronic equipment. It now sells an essential form of communication,
in today’s mobile world.
The Cellphone is now sold as a cultural
icon – symbolising a personality of the consumer. The advertising jumps out at
you, no matter where you are – not only through the visual and verbal networks
of advertising but also the subliminal peer pressure of today’s society.
1.2 Built for Humans
Items that are built for humans in mind are now the huge pulling forces
in today’s markets. User-friendly products are now becoming major exploit due
to the fact they can easily exploit any market. Ergonomics has become a
multimillion-dollar industry – with most products being designed with the human
in mind. Consumers like the security of mind by knowing that a Cellphone
contains certain aspects that make their life easier or safer.
An example of a good user-friendly marketing campaign is Nokia’s. Their
“Human Technology” campaign improved their share price from a low of less that
$27 U.S, to an all time high of $30.25 US, which is still increasing. Consumers
responded well to the campaign, increasing sales by over 25%.
All the phones now produced have some form of ‘hands free calling’.
Motorola now are installing “BASS boosted, CLEAR response hands free speakers”,
for less ‘mechanical’ distortion and more ‘human’ crisp, clear sound.
1.3 Not
just Communications
Mobile phones are developing to more that mobile communications. They
now people phonebooks, email, Internet, arcade machine, timetable, organiser,
alarm, pager, text editor, modem, fax and now contain more functions then a
personal computer. It could be said that cellphone's are the personal computers
of the future.
People now go out looking for which phone has got the most functions,
and Cellphone companies take great advantage of this by glorifying the
functions on their mobiles.
1.3 Additional
Services provide by the Cellphone manufacturer
These greatly determine the Cellphone market. Alcatel a large
communications company offers no support for their distributors and do not sell
directly to the market, for this reason they sell very poorly in most
countries. However in New Zealand, Vodafone’s largest selling mobile brand is
Alcatel – Vodafone do most of the advertising and hire purchase for the
Alcatel’s because they suit well to Vodafone’s pre-paid market (which accounts
to 70% of Vodafone’s sales).
Nokia are at the other end of the spectrum, developing advertising,
customer support and providing an expensive hire purchase scheme for the
consumers – this in turn has made them the largest Cellphone manufacture in the
world.
1.4 Effective Product Naming
The names of cellphone's are becoming abbreviated and cut to suit the
style of the target audience. Simplicity is the key when naming a Cellphone,
something that people remember – a letter, word, number or feeling works well
as the consumer is not thrown into ‘manufacturing jargon’.
Good use of numbers is the Nokia Series, 252, 918, 5110, 5120, 6220,
8250 – each one is easily remembered as the short term memory can store up to 7
digits.
Good use of letters is demonstrated with the new Motorola series, L
series and V series.
1.5 The use of brand loyalty
With a well-established company, it is easier for them to get their
products noticed. They do this by placing their company logo in the background,
in the corner, anywhere where is noticeable but not distracting, on their
advertising. People recognise these symbols and instantly want to know more.
Alcatel and Motorola use this all the time, placing their logo in the
background to posters, handouts, anything that gets them noticed.
1.6 Styling
the product to the target market
There is no point is selling ice to Eskimos, the same rule applies to
Cellphone marketing. Cellphone marketeers have only just trained to the US
market – with their style to distinctive, making it hard for Cellphone
manufactures to adapt to the market.
French cellphone's are more style then function – often containing
fewer buttons and comfortable shape.
Asian cellphone's are more function and size – having enough
electronics to scare a personal computer in the size of a few credit cards.
Bibliography
1) Handouts – Motorola: Lseries+,
WEB W/O WIRES
2) GSM
V2288 FEATURE LIST
3) Nokia: 5120, The smart
phone with the smart key
4) 8250,
Walk on the Blue Side
5) 5110,
The smart phone with the smart key
6) 6210,
Be ready
7) 8210,
Live with Passion
8) Alcatel: One Touch 302
And
various Sagem, Ericsson & Philips
1) Web sites - www.motarola.com.au
– For company profile
2) www.nokia-asia.com – for company profile
3) www.nokia.com – for customer support
4) www.alcatel.com – for company profile
5) www.sagem.com – for new phone web adverts
6) www.sony.com – for new phone web adverts
7) www.cnet.com – for market research on Nokia
expected sales
8)
www.quicken.excite.com/tickersearch - for market capital and annual revenue of
Nokia and Motorola.
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Infographic Tuesday - Flow chart of wine
I know. Its not exactly 100% business. But you would be surprised what business goes down after a fine glass of Merlot, Bin 555 or my personal favorite Santa Cristina.
So lean back into your chair, kick your feet up onto your desk (avoid the laptop though) and have a good laugh.
So lean back into your chair, kick your feet up onto your desk (avoid the laptop though) and have a good laugh.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Monday, July 16, 2012
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Infographic Tuesday - Entreprenuers
I
am not a huge fan of the term "Entrepreneur". As far as I am concerned
these people are not the peak - they are simply the level that the rest
of us should have achieved.
An entrepreneur could be a fantastic worker within a company. They only reason they go it alone is due to frustrations and inability to fix problems internally.
A failure of a company, not of them.
So rather than thinking about praising an entreprenuer..........turn it around,
Who was their previous employer?
What constraints did they have placed on them?
What went wrong?
How can I avoid this?
These are the keys to keeping these talented individuals inside a company - thus lifting the company to a new level.
An entrepreneur could be a fantastic worker within a company. They only reason they go it alone is due to frustrations and inability to fix problems internally.
A failure of a company, not of them.
So rather than thinking about praising an entreprenuer..........turn it around,
Who was their previous employer?
What constraints did they have placed on them?
What went wrong?
How can I avoid this?
These are the keys to keeping these talented individuals inside a company - thus lifting the company to a new level.
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Infographic Tuesday - Brand Colours
Great little infographic about what colours mean to your brand. Something designers are aware of (fyi designers go check out http://www.farrstdevelopments.blogspot.com) but business types need to learn.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Infographic Thursday - The App Bubble
Recently I was contemplating building an empire via making apps.
Turns out that while there are a few success stories - there a plenty of failures.
Turns out that while there are a few success stories - there a plenty of failures.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Small beginnings and big bytes - an Apple story
Ok so it was my sons 1st birthday recently, and he got one of these from his grandma
But you see while I don't profess to be a big Apple fan. Fact of the matter is they are a big part of my life of who I am and how I have got to where I am.
I most likely would not have leaped into IT/IS or even business computing - except for the fact that when I was 5 - my father got me this.
This good ol' Apple II lasted me all the way though my Schooling years. It did nothing really practical, it had no printer, no word processor. It had a joystick, increase ram and a 4 colour display - so it was mainly used for games.
But it taught me some very basic things. How to type fast, how to think fast and most importantly how to be patient when it comes to loading. At the time if you wanted a personal computer and had money you got a Apple II, if you were cheap or had some fancy ERP tool you got IBM's 8086. It was a strange market. But basically the II changed the way people thought about computing. It created personal computing.
Then when at Middle school I got to use this:
The Mac classic. The perfect device with the worst execution. It had a lot going for it except good marketing. It was an all in one unit. It was light enough to carry. It HAD resolution. It was the first FANLESS computers - something unheard of in the electronics industry.
This computer should have captured the whole market. But it failed horribly and was eaten alive in the red market that had become the personal computer. Acer, IBM, Compaq, Tandy, HP, Atari............it was no longer a 2 horse game. And some of the competitors were cut throat pirates.
Apple was being cut and started to bleed. From recall this was when Jobs started to get young and reckless - the other owners of apple noticed and cut him from the fray. Thankfully they still had a fan base.
Come to College I found myself using one of these...
The LC was not a bad machine, it just wasn't a good one. It was doing what everyone else was doing hardware wise, software wise it was completely propriety. This was the 90's and now Microsoft ruled the roost - not by selling computers, but by selling the operating system. The market had changed and people paid pennies less for the hardware, but more for all the software. The giants of the valley were now companies like Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia........ as they had the I.P. and most of the hardware was now being made out of China.
Jobs was rehired, and refocused. A massive cash injection came into Apple via Microsoft. And I then had to deal with this before I went to University.
The imac was everything the Mac Classic should have been, it was an all in one unit that had the marketing weight of a heavy weight boxer on crack. It forced the competition to rethink its game. To think about things like case design and ergonomics. To think about colours (beige cases and monitors were all the rage - not!).
However at this point the computers only had a cult following. They were expensive and next to useless to most people.
It was never that I disliked Apple...........I always appreciated them from an engineers perspective. It was that I could see their failures from a business perspective. But I was fortunate to own the computer that made Apple a great computer company. A world leader. Now my son can experience that with their iPAD.
Now you can understand why Apple's model had to change - there market was never computers. That was simply the first market they tried. They needed to think past that and find out what people were not doing. In the 1970's people were not making personal computers. In the 1990's people were not making MP3 players with lots of storage. In the 2000's people were not making useable, reliable tablets.
Turns out the Woz (the others guy who started Apple with Jobs in the 70's) knew this all along. Check out his Q&A below.
http://farrstdevelopments.blogspot.com/2012/06/listen-to-what-woz-has-to-say.html
But you see while I don't profess to be a big Apple fan. Fact of the matter is they are a big part of my life of who I am and how I have got to where I am.
I most likely would not have leaped into IT/IS or even business computing - except for the fact that when I was 5 - my father got me this.
This good ol' Apple II lasted me all the way though my Schooling years. It did nothing really practical, it had no printer, no word processor. It had a joystick, increase ram and a 4 colour display - so it was mainly used for games.
But it taught me some very basic things. How to type fast, how to think fast and most importantly how to be patient when it comes to loading. At the time if you wanted a personal computer and had money you got a Apple II, if you were cheap or had some fancy ERP tool you got IBM's 8086. It was a strange market. But basically the II changed the way people thought about computing. It created personal computing.
Then when at Middle school I got to use this:
The Mac classic. The perfect device with the worst execution. It had a lot going for it except good marketing. It was an all in one unit. It was light enough to carry. It HAD resolution. It was the first FANLESS computers - something unheard of in the electronics industry.
This computer should have captured the whole market. But it failed horribly and was eaten alive in the red market that had become the personal computer. Acer, IBM, Compaq, Tandy, HP, Atari............it was no longer a 2 horse game. And some of the competitors were cut throat pirates.
Apple was being cut and started to bleed. From recall this was when Jobs started to get young and reckless - the other owners of apple noticed and cut him from the fray. Thankfully they still had a fan base.
Come to College I found myself using one of these...
Jobs was rehired, and refocused. A massive cash injection came into Apple via Microsoft. And I then had to deal with this before I went to University.
The imac was everything the Mac Classic should have been, it was an all in one unit that had the marketing weight of a heavy weight boxer on crack. It forced the competition to rethink its game. To think about things like case design and ergonomics. To think about colours (beige cases and monitors were all the rage - not!).
However at this point the computers only had a cult following. They were expensive and next to useless to most people.
It was never that I disliked Apple...........I always appreciated them from an engineers perspective. It was that I could see their failures from a business perspective. But I was fortunate to own the computer that made Apple a great computer company. A world leader. Now my son can experience that with their iPAD.
Now you can understand why Apple's model had to change - there market was never computers. That was simply the first market they tried. They needed to think past that and find out what people were not doing. In the 1970's people were not making personal computers. In the 1990's people were not making MP3 players with lots of storage. In the 2000's people were not making useable, reliable tablets.
Turns out the Woz (the others guy who started Apple with Jobs in the 70's) knew this all along. Check out his Q&A below.
http://farrstdevelopments.blogspot.com/2012/06/listen-to-what-woz-has-to-say.html
Labels:
Apple,
bullpad,
communications,
confidence,
cost benefit analysis,
decision making,
delusions,
economics,
education,
indirect competition,
internet,
introverts,
marketing,
poor business practices
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Infographic Tuesday : Word of mouth = sales
Something that took me a long time to get the balls enough to ask for, was a recommendation. But fact of the matter these give you 10 times the sales any marketing campaign can give you.
Word of mouth is the purest sales gospel.
Word of mouth is the purest sales gospel.
Thursday, May 24, 2012
How to sell anything to anyone. The Apple philosophy
Stolen from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-26/mad-libs-startup-pitch
I am off on holiday for a month in New York - so if your there and want to catch up for a coffee - email me farrst@gmail or tweet me @farrst
-Stew
I am off on holiday for a month in New York - so if your there and want to catch up for a coffee - email me farrst@gmail or tweet me @farrst
-Stew
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Infographic Tuesday - Banner ads, who clicks
You will click hopefully...........because that buys me beer inspirational motivation to do more stuff for you.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Monday, April 9, 2012
Rubbish Suppliers and blast-from-the-past emails
Digging through some old emails, I found a fantastic one about a poorly performing supplier.
Names have been changed to protect all involved........have a read. Then you decide if you would deal with this supplier?
But I will simply explain the events that transpired yesterday.
During his presentation, it became obvious that at-least 60% was to stroke his own ego. However when put on the spot about his own business issues, he did not have the substance to back it up.
(I can elaborate on this more if you require).
If his ego could not be stroked during the presentation, he would then move to downgrade the people in the room or the products you sell.
As * said best to me afterward "He always attempts to be right even when he is wrong". There were threats that "* are currently in a partner agreement", with emphasis on current.
However I would like to congratulate everyone else in the room on the same not. They were polite, and keep their feelings to themselves, I know a lot of the people in the industry would have told * to f-off if they had been put in this position.
Names have been changed to protect all involved........have a read. Then you decide if you would deal with this supplier?
"Hope you holiday is
going well. I thought it was best I gave you an update about the events of yesterday.
As you know Myself,* had a meeting with *, as a basic
training session for the * product in NZ.
Meeting *
reminding myself of why I left Australia.
Talking to the other staff who have dealt with him, needless to say his attitudes are in the wrong place.
Talking to the other staff who have dealt with him, needless to say his attitudes are in the wrong place.
But I will simply explain the events that transpired yesterday.
With everyone in the
room, it was noticeable that * was not at ease with the people there. It
became faily obvious that he was demanding a very high level of support
(something that was starting to tire *)
He suggested that we
introduce ourselves, to which * was first to volunteer. When * said he
was the Automation sales rep, * immediately questioned why he did not have * in he portfolio. Stating - "I will have to have a talk to * later
about this" He then continued to dominate the conversation not allowing * to
finish speaking about what he hoped to achieve out of the training session. This
was not only stupid (as we were all attending a "* Basics" training
session) but also completely arrogant to assume that pushing his complaints to * would some how fix the situation. Eventually I spoke up stating that
"As of this point * is not a part of his
portfolio, so you can not blame him", to which his reply was "clearly something
is wrong if * is not there."
At this point *
looked liked he wanted to throw something at *, however he bit his lip and
remained quiet. The introductions continued around the table, ending with *
introducing himself.
During his presentation, it became obvious that at-least 60% was to stroke his own ego. However when put on the spot about his own business issues, he did not have the substance to back it up.
(I can elaborate on this more if you require).
If his ego could not be stroked during the presentation, he would then move to downgrade the people in the room or the products you sell.
As * said best to me afterward "He always attempts to be right even when he is wrong". There were threats that "* are currently in a partner agreement", with emphasis on current.
Other bold claims
were also made, one in particular was "That's bullshit, I came over 18 months ago
and trained people here (*)" to which I questioned "Who was
trained?" to which I got no reply.
* was supposed to
have known a Japanese protocol. Because according to Steve he should know
because he was Asian. (He is Chinese).
He failed to accept
our claims that we have to support more than one agency, and would attempt to
subvert out existing agencies, often asking "Does anything else you have do
this?".
By lunchtime both * looked like they could not be bothered continuing the meeting
after lunch, and said thank you and attended emails.
I grabbed * and
went to lunch - explaining to him that this is how some people are, and he was
free to speak his mind. Needless to say he was not in a good mood and needed to
vent.
* took over in
the afternoon - which eased things somewhat. This also meant * did not need
to attend - which was a good thing as it looked like * had painted a big
target on his back.
I found that *'s
attitude was not only negative, but wrong. Lord knows how he wants us to promote
sales of this product after that episode.
Very rarely have I had such rubbish in front of a supplier, and
never have I had it FROM a supplier.
Very rarely have I had such rubbish in front of a supplier, and
never have I had it FROM a supplier.
However I would like to congratulate everyone else in the room on the same not. They were polite, and keep their feelings to themselves, I know a lot of the people in the industry would have told * to f-off if they had been put in this position.
I just feel you
should be aware about what happened, as I imagine there will be an email from * complaining about how we are not good enough."
Infographic Tuesday - LinkedIn Networking
I got a few emails regarding my Facebook InfoTuesday post. So thought I better continue the trend with another networking site.
Turns out people get projects through linkedin also! So perhaps that could be another tool for your sales guys to get into doors previously left closed?
Turns out people get projects through linkedin also! So perhaps that could be another tool for your sales guys to get into doors previously left closed?
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Infographic Tuesday : Facebook
As of yet Blind Management doesn't yet have a Facebook page (its on the 'todo list'.......in the meantime check out the Farrst Development one). But here is a great little infographic about stuff you didn't know about Facebook.
-Stew
-Stew
Thursday, March 29, 2012
HR, Recruitment and Inspiring Messages to Staff
Jonothan Rice recently posted on his recuitment blog the following:
http://riceconsulting.co.nz/thewhiteboard/cover-letter-quotes-prove-you-have-nothing-original-to-say/
While I don't really want to get into the debate as to what should or shouldn't be in CV's etc. I do think inspirational messages are important motivational tools. Here are some manifestos that I have taking a liking too recently.
http://riceconsulting.co.nz/thewhiteboard/cover-letter-quotes-prove-you-have-nothing-original-to-say/
While I don't really want to get into the debate as to what should or shouldn't be in CV's etc. I do think inspirational messages are important motivational tools. Here are some manifestos that I have taking a liking too recently.
Friday, March 16, 2012
Nokia Tablet
With a rumor of a Nokia Tablet coming out. Thought I better post something I worked on a few years ago.....The Nokia based "BullPad"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)